Arizona Equality Official Website tracking the progress of the complaint
filed against the State of Arizona on January 6, 2014,
for Marriage Equality.

Facebook Twitter

 

SCOTUS Blogs: Tennessee ruling on married same-sex couples


 Scotus Blog

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE ONLINE

Sponsored by Bloomberg Law, Lyle Denniston has posted on March 14th, 2014, the following information.

Citing "a rising tide" of federal court rulings in favor of marriage rights for same-sex couples, and anticipating that state bans on such marriages may soon "become a footnote in the annals of American history," a federal judge in Nashville ordered Tennessee officials on Friday to begin recognizing the out-of-state marriages of one lesbian couple and two gay couples.

U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger emphasized that she was only ruling temporarily, and only for those three couples, while their case continues in her court.  While she noted that a string of federal court rulings has now gone uniformly in favor of marriage equality, she said her final decision on recognition of such marriages may be influenced if that trend does not continue.

Tennessee not only bans same-sex marriages, especially under a 2006 state constitutional amendment that got an eighty-percent majority of voters, but it also refuses to recognize any such marriages performed elsewhere.  In the case before Judge Trauger, two of the couples had been married in New York and one in California -- two states among the seventeen that now permit such marriages.   All three couples now live in Tennessee, and are seeking equal access to benefits that go with being married.

The judge stressed that she was only ruling, at this point, on whether to block temporarily the refusal to recognize non-Tennessee marriages already performed.  She said her ruling should not be interpreted as saying anything about the ban on couples who want to get married in Tennessee.

And yet, in spite of the narrowness that she stressed, the judge's decision relied heavily upon the reasoning used by other judges in same-sex marriage cases.

She commented: "At some point in the future, likely with the benefit of additional precedent from circuit courts and, perhaps, the Supreme Court, the court will be asked to make a final ruling on the [three couples'] claims."

She added that, "at this point, all signs indicate that, in the eyes of the United States Constitution, the [three couples'] marriages will be placed on an equal footing with those of heterosexual couples."

Judge Trauger was the third judge in a southern or border state to find at least some right to marriage equality for same-sex couples.  The others were in Kentucky and Virginia.  State bans on same-sex marriage got some of the strongest support from voters in that part of the U.S.

So far, no federal court of appeals has issued a final ruling on the issue since the Supreme Court's decision last June, in United States v. Windsor, striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act's ban on marital benefits for already married same-sex couples.   Hearings are scheduled in the courts of appeals in April and May in cases involving the state bans in Oklahoma, Utah, and Virginia, and a hearing is likely to be scheduled before long in circuits that have been or will be asked to rule on bans in Nevada and Texas.


Refernece:


Subscribe to our mailing list 

* indicates required



Same-Sex Marriage and ChildrenSame-Sex Marriage and Children is the first book to bring together historical, social science, and legal considerations to comprehensively respond to the objections to same-sex marriage that are based on the need to promote so-called "responsible procreation" and child welfare. Carlos A. Ball places the current marriage debates within a broader historical context by exploring how the procreative and child welfare claims used to try to deny same-sex couples the opportunity to marry are similar to earlier arguments used to defend interracial marriage bans, laws prohibiting disabled individuals from marrying, and the differential treatment of children born out of wedlock. Ball also draws a link between welfare reform and same-sex marriage bans by explaining how conservative proponents have defended both based on the need for the government to promote responsible procreation among heterosexuals. 

In addition, Ball examines the social science studies relied on by opponents of same-sex marriage and explains in a highly engaging and accessible way why they do not support the contention that biological status and parental gender matter when it comes to parenting. He also explores the relevance of the social science studies on the children of lesbians and gay men to the question of whether same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. In doing so, the book looks closely at the gay marriage cases that recently reached the Supreme Court and explains why the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans cannot be defended on the basis that maintaining marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution helps to promote the best interests of children. Same-Sex Marriage and Children will help lawyers, law professors, judges, legislators, social and political scientists, historians, and child welfare officials-as well as general readers interested in matters related to marriage and families-understand the empirical and legal issues behind the intersection of same-sex marriage and children's welfare.


© 2014 Arizona Equality